def validate_case_matches_checkpoint(do_lower_case, init_checkpoint):
  """Checks whether the casing config is consistent with the checkpoint name."""

  # The casing has to be passed in by the user and there is no explicit check
  # as to whether it matches the checkpoint. The casing information probably
  # should have been stored in the bert_config.json file, but it's not, so
  # we have to heuristically detect it to validate.

  if not init_checkpoint:
    return

  m = re.match("^.*?([A-Za-z0-9_-]+)/bert_model.ckpt", init_checkpoint)
  if m is None:
    return

  model_name = m.group(1)

  lower_models = [
      "uncased_L-24_H-1024_A-16", "uncased_L-12_H-768_A-12",
      "multilingual_L-12_H-768_A-12", "chinese_L-12_H-768_A-12"
  ]

  cased_models = [
      "cased_L-12_H-768_A-12", "cased_L-24_H-1024_A-16",
      "multi_cased_L-12_H-768_A-12"
  ]

  is_bad_config = False
  if model_name in lower_models and not do_lower_case:
    is_bad_config = True
    actual_flag = "False"
    case_name = "lowercased"
    opposite_flag = "True"

  if model_name in cased_models and do_lower_case:
    is_bad_config = True
    actual_flag = "True"
    case_name = "cased"
    opposite_flag = "False"

  if is_bad_config:
    raise ValueError(
        "You passed in `--do_lower_case=%s` with `--init_checkpoint=%s`. "
        "However, `%s` seems to be a %s model, so you "
        "should pass in `--do_lower_case=%s` so that the fine-tuning matches "
        "how the model was pre-training. If this error is wrong, please "
        "just comment out this check." % (actual_flag, init_checkpoint,
                                          model_name, case_name, opposite_flag))
Checks whether the casing config is consistent with the checkpoint name.
tokenization.py